Additive & Spectral: Studie 2
The history of Elektronische Musik started with additive synthesis. In his composition Studie II, Karlheinz Stockhausen composed timbres by superimposing sinusoidal components. In that era this was realized through single sine wave oscillators, tuned to the desired frequency and recorded on tape.
The Score
Studie II is the attempt to fully compose music on a timbral level in a rigid score. Stockhausen therefor generated tables with frequencies and mixed tones for creating source material. Fig.1 shows an excerpt from the timeline, which was used to arrange the material. The timbres are recognizable through their vertical position in the upper system, whereas the lower system represents articulation, respectively fades and amplitudes.
The Scale
Central Interval
For Studie II, Stockhausen created a frequency scale, which not only affects the fundamental frequencies but also the overtone structure of all sounds which can be represented by this scale. He chose a central interval, based on the following formula:
This odd interval has 25 equally spaced pitches in 4 octaves. It is slightly higher than the semitone in the equal temperament, which has 12 equally spaced pitches in one octave:
Interval Comparison
The following buttons play both intervals starting at 443 Hz for a comparison. The difference is minute but can be detected by trained ears:
Pitch Scale
Stockhausen used the \(\sqrt[25]{5}\) interval to create a pitch scale. Starting from a root pitch of $100$ Hz, the scale ascends in 80 \(\sqrt[25]{5}\) steps. However, the highest pitch value used for composing timbres lies at:
The Timbres
From the 81 frequencies in the pitch scale, Stockhausen creates 5 different timbres - in German Tongemische. Each timbre is based on the \(\sqrt[25]{5}\) interval but with five different spread factors, namely 1,2,3,4 and 5. The following table shows all five timbres for the base frequency of 100 Hz, with the spread factor in the exponent:
Partial Ratio |
Partial 1 [Hz] |
Partial 2 [Hz] |
Partial 3 [Hz] |
Partial 4 [Hz] |
Partial 5 [Hz] |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Timbre 1 |
\((\sqrt[25]{5})^1\) |
100.00 |
106.65 |
113.74 |
121.30 |
129.37 |
Timbre 2 |
\((\sqrt[25]{5})^2\) |
100.00 |
113.74 |
129.37 |
147.15 |
167.37 |
Timbre 3 |
\((\sqrt[25]{5})^3\) |
100.00 |
121.30 |
147.15 |
178.50 |
216.52 |
Timbre 4 |
\((\sqrt[25]{5})^4\) |
100.00 |
129.37 |
167.37 |
216.52 |
280.12 |
Timbre 5 |
\((\sqrt[25]{5})^5\) |
100.00 |
137.97 |
190.37 |
262.65 |
362.39 |
Pitch (Hz):
Spacing Factor:
P1 (Hz):
P2 (Hz):
P3 (Hz):
P4 (Hz):
P5 (Hz):
Output Gain:
Duration (seconds):
Envelope:
Frequency Domain:
References
1998
- Agostino Di Scipio.
Compositional models in xenakis's electroacoustic music.
Perspectives of New Music, pages 201–243, 1998.
[details] [BibTeX▼]